I was blessed to have heard early on in my research that fluoride in water is at a minimum unnecessary, so ditto in toothpaste....
For over a decade I have drank almost exclusively, water that I have boiled first.
A good practice is to drink still hot water you have boiled on an empty stomach...
Also I was blessed to have a hypnotist help me let go the tobacco some 25 years ago now, thank God. That was tough, and the coffee too, at that time...to make it easier to stay off the tobacco .
Re bottled water, sadly that means plastic intake, unless tis a glass bottle.
Thanks GK! I agree on the plastic water bottles. I was discussing this with my husband and he reminded me that all of our water in our homes comes through plastic pipes 🥴. It is hard to extract this material from our lives but I do agree home filtration is certainly less waste than bottled water.
I have read about links to fluoride making bones more brittle. I need to learn more about this pathway perhaps in an effort to write a Substack on the subject.
i read years ago ... sodium flouride [in water toothpaste dental treatment etc ] has a different metabolic pathway than calcium flouride that is naturally in all bone and teeth and is needed there,,,veternarians inject unruley uncooperative bulls with flouride .. makes them into lambs...
I have read some on this but am not informed enough to write about it. I want to learn more about these metabolic pathways and why what is in our water is even more dangerous than what is in toothpaste.
I think I was lucky ... Fluoride was introduced sometimes in the 70s, so I probably had a few early years when I was wasn't exposed to much (mum gave me little tablets, not too often I don't think). And I had terrible teeth growing up (either that or a dentist who found lots of holes to fill), so thinking about it, it made no difference to my level of tooth decay.
I have heard many stories like this. Fortunately people are waking up...l just wish the would do it faster! Thanks for the time you take to read and respond to my newsletters. I am grateful for your insight.
Your point about fluoride in municipal water being a medication, delivered without any informed consent, is very well made. It's astonishing how pervasive the paternalistic 'public health' attitude is, both within medicine and dentistry.
My Substacks are the newsletters I send to my patients. A slightly moderated tone of how I truly feel on this topic in an effort to get people to read and consider. The impact has been amazingly well received. It’s the slow peeling of the onion that will help those so blinded by the ‘God like’ image we’ve given those in the medical field. We are just as flawed as any other human and without an honest discourse no one’s health will ever benefit from the corruption of the scientific method.
The difference between Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) and Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR), which appears in the first half of Dr. Jessica Funk's text is extremely important, is also very important when it comes to vaccines.(When subjects include the general public or healthy individuals)
However, pharmaceutical companies, the CDC, and the FDA never mention ARR, but advertise using RRR.The effective probability for an individual is ARR, never RRR.
The estimate of the incidence of side effects and effects in RCTs is a super-extrapolation estimate,
and it is well known that extrapolation estimates have a large error even for phenomena related to physical laws.
If BNT162b2 is 5 billion doses, estimating the effect from 20,000 clinical trial recipients is the same as estimating 1 by 0.000004, and the error is extremely large.
Thanks for calling this out... The picture of the baby and the vaccines is so telling about how big pharma is profiting at our expense!
A true horror story...using medicine weaponized against our children!
Great work Jessica.
My two cents....
I was blessed to have heard early on in my research that fluoride in water is at a minimum unnecessary, so ditto in toothpaste....
For over a decade I have drank almost exclusively, water that I have boiled first.
A good practice is to drink still hot water you have boiled on an empty stomach...
Also I was blessed to have a hypnotist help me let go the tobacco some 25 years ago now, thank God. That was tough, and the coffee too, at that time...to make it easier to stay off the tobacco .
Re bottled water, sadly that means plastic intake, unless tis a glass bottle.
Best to have a water jug that ain't plastic....
Thanks GK! I agree on the plastic water bottles. I was discussing this with my husband and he reminded me that all of our water in our homes comes through plastic pipes 🥴. It is hard to extract this material from our lives but I do agree home filtration is certainly less waste than bottled water.
Does anyone have any information regarding fluoride and osteoporosis?
I have read about links to fluoride making bones more brittle. I need to learn more about this pathway perhaps in an effort to write a Substack on the subject.
i read years ago ... sodium flouride [in water toothpaste dental treatment etc ] has a different metabolic pathway than calcium flouride that is naturally in all bone and teeth and is needed there,,,veternarians inject unruley uncooperative bulls with flouride .. makes them into lambs...
I have read some on this but am not informed enough to write about it. I want to learn more about these metabolic pathways and why what is in our water is even more dangerous than what is in toothpaste.
I think I was lucky ... Fluoride was introduced sometimes in the 70s, so I probably had a few early years when I was wasn't exposed to much (mum gave me little tablets, not too often I don't think). And I had terrible teeth growing up (either that or a dentist who found lots of holes to fill), so thinking about it, it made no difference to my level of tooth decay.
I have heard many stories like this. Fortunately people are waking up...l just wish the would do it faster! Thanks for the time you take to read and respond to my newsletters. I am grateful for your insight.
Your point about fluoride in municipal water being a medication, delivered without any informed consent, is very well made. It's astonishing how pervasive the paternalistic 'public health' attitude is, both within medicine and dentistry.
My Substacks are the newsletters I send to my patients. A slightly moderated tone of how I truly feel on this topic in an effort to get people to read and consider. The impact has been amazingly well received. It’s the slow peeling of the onion that will help those so blinded by the ‘God like’ image we’ve given those in the medical field. We are just as flawed as any other human and without an honest discourse no one’s health will ever benefit from the corruption of the scientific method.
The difference between Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) and Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR), which appears in the first half of Dr. Jessica Funk's text is extremely important, is also very important when it comes to vaccines.(When subjects include the general public or healthy individuals)
However, pharmaceutical companies, the CDC, and the FDA never mention ARR, but advertise using RRR.The effective probability for an individual is ARR, never RRR.
For reference, the dangers of fluoride-based drugs: https://robertyoho.substack.com/p/318-cipro-levaquin-and-other-fluoroquinolones?publication_id=690651&post_id=145816363
Example of ARR vs. RRR:
Pfizer's BNT162b2 ARR = 0.716%, RRR = 95% (However, this is clearly a gene therapy drug
Considering that doctors and scholars around the world later uncovered the fake parts, the ARR and RRR are even lower)
SK-Zooster (Shingrix) (shingles) ARR = 0.9%, RRR 94.2%
Meiji Replicon (Sarscov2) ARR = 0.5%, RRR = 95.5% (Also a gene therapy drug)
Sequirus Flucelvax® Quad (for infulenzaA,B) ARR = 17.5%, RRR = 51.9%
However, Placebo was administered meningococcal ACWY-vax instead of saline
In short, it was a fraudulent clinical trial, and all it says is that Flucelvax is more effective against influenza than ACWY-vax.
GSK's Arexvy (RSV) ARR = 0.26%, RRR = 82.5%
Moderna's mRNA-1345 (RSV) ARR = 0.53%, RRR = 68.4% (also a gene therapy drug)
Gardasil: HPV uninfected: ARR = 0.7%, RRR ≒ 50%
Gardasil: HPV already infected: ARR = 3.07%, RRR ≒ 70%
Girdasil contains the neurotoxin ALuminum at 416±75μg/dose
https://www.corvelva.it/speciale-corvelva/vaccinegate-en/metal-analysis-by-icp-ms.html
However, it is known that administering a vaccine for a disease when you are infected can actually be harmful.
Any good doctor would check your physical condition before administering the vaccine.
In the case of Gardasil, blood tests should be done before vaccination to check whether the patient is infected or not.
Vaccination while infected is highly carcinogenic, so regular testing and early surgery are recommended.
However, the authorities do not make this mandatory, and I feel that they are being malicious.
Recently,vaccines have been approved only based on the increase in antibody titers without actual clinical trials (RCTs), but
as you know, RNA viruses mutate one after another, so antibodies are less effective against actual mutated RNA viruses.
What's more, I recently learned that RCTs have not even been conducted for the approval of conventional vaccines for children for quite some time.
https://icandecide.org/no-placebo/
The estimate of the incidence of side effects and effects in RCTs is a super-extrapolation estimate,
and it is well known that extrapolation estimates have a large error even for phenomena related to physical laws.
If BNT162b2 is 5 billion doses, estimating the effect from 20,000 clinical trial recipients is the same as estimating 1 by 0.000004, and the error is extremely large.