For quite some time, I have been harping on the fact that the early science of the COVID shots would lead to the continued spread of the SARS CoV-2 virus because the technology was ineffective at producing benefit where the virus enters…the oral and nasopharynx. At best, people taking the experimental therapy would have mitigated symptoms but it would NEVER be able to produce herd immunity, prevent contraction or stop the spread of this viral pathogen. It only took about 3-4 months following the biggest push to get a shot in everyone’s arm (May 2020) that the CDC had to stop counting cases amongst the vaccinated because it was looking bad for their rhetoric.
Add to this ‘unintended consequences’ of adverse events that were being experienced by some unfortunate trial subjects (willing Americans to put their faith in Pharma) and absolutely NO LONG TERM safety data, we had the potential for an absolute disaster. To any critical thinking individual with even the slightest bit of curiosity about the world around them, it was stating the obvious that the COVID shots were both an epic fail at stopping the spread but far worse (the stuff the keeps me awake at night) the damages to some recipients who put so much faith into what their government preached to them.
I see these damages in real time! I have a unique opportunity to care for 30-40 different patients everyday. I sometimes know far more about their medical history than I actually need to provide treatment. Not because I inquire, but because we have created a welcoming environment and patients want to talk about what is happening to themselves, especially in light of the pandemic where they have little outside contact. I see them and they are thrilled to have another human face to talk to and I hear about what good and bad has happened to them since their last visit. That means I hear about medical conditions that don’t always relate to their dental care. Since March, I have been witnessing a trend unlike anything I have seen in my more than two decades of patient care….strokes, pulmonary embolisms, sudden onset aggressive cancers, heart attacks, sudden and aggressive dementia, a myriad of cardiac issues leading to hospitalizations and death. Anecdotal, I know, but curious and concerning.
And then, THIS comes out…a huge study of 145 different countries that demonstrate the most vaccinated countries have both higher COVID cases but also worsening death rates over the year prior when no ‘vaccines’ were available.
Before highlighting some of the key points of this study, the definition of Bayesian analysis may help: a technique that provides a formal method for integration of prior knowledge from other imaging methods. Bayesian techniques estimate a form of solution based on experimental data and prior knowledge expressed in probability distribution.
The statistically significant and overwhelmingly positive causal impact after vaccine deployment on the dependent variables total deaths and total cases per million should be highly worrisome for policy makers. They indicate a marked increase in both COVID-19 related cases and death due directly to a vaccine deployment that was originally sold to the public as the “key to gain back our freedoms.” The effect of vaccines on total cases per million and its low positive association with total vaccinations per hundred signifies a limited impact of vaccines on lowering COVID-19 associated cases. These results should encourage local policy makers to make policy decisions based on data, not narrative, and based on local conditions, not global or national mandates. These results should also encourage policy makers to begin looking for other avenues out of the pandemic aside from mass vaccination campaigns.
“Untruth naturally afflicts historical information. There are various reasons that make this unavoidable. One of them is partisanship for opinions and schools. If the soul is impartial in receiving information, it devotes to that information the share of critical investigation the information deserves, and its truth or untruth thus becomes clear. However, if the soul is infected with partisanship for a particular opinion or sect, it accepts without a moment’s hesitation the information that is agreeable to it. Prejudice and partisanship obscure the critical faculty and preclude critical investigation. The result is that falsehoods are accepted and transmitted” —Ibn Khaldun, 1379 A.D
The "anecdotal" reports are very valuable when they come from a trusted source in the midst of a functionally censorious environment.